Friday , April 26 2019
Home / External Links / New York Times Report ‘How China Got Sri-Lanka to cough up a port’: A counter narrative

New York Times Report ‘How China Got Sri-Lanka to cough up a port’: A counter narrative

New York Times Report “How China Got Sri-Lanka to cough up a port”: A counter narrative

  • Pakistan and Sri-Lanka have different political setups, circumstances, geo-strategic importance and economic realities
  • The major difference between the two ports is that
    • Hambantota port was given to China by Srilanka for political reasons as Srilankan President Rajapakasa  also established a cricket stadium and an international airport because Hambantota happened to be his hometown
    • China conceived the idea of CPEC and Gwadar and Pakistan became a partner in view of its potential
  • Unlike Hambantota, China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is spread throughout the country, and through Gwadar Central Asian states will gain access to African and Middle Eastern Markets
  • Pakistan joined CPEC purely due to economic considerations because of  a crumbling economy and an ever prevalent energy crisis
  • Out of the $ 62 billion investment in CPEC, 35 billion is a Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Financing is arranged by the Chinese companies to service these debts from their own earnings
  • The Infrastructural projects are based on concessional loans arrangements with interest rates of approximately 2% that will generate economic activity and adequate revenues to repay these loans
  • The CPEC linkage with Central Asia will generate economic activity in the entire region, unlike Hambantota which has no such potential or dimensions
  • There was no demand from businesses in Hambantota port, unlike Gwadar where there is demand from both Central Asia, Middle East and Europe.
  • 26 countries are part of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) of which CPEC is a part, unlike Hambantota which was a sole venture.
  • The feasibility studies of Hambantota were not economically viable and the port was unable to break-even unlike Gwadar which has a national consensus, both economically and politically.
  • Important to note that another reason for failure of Hambantota was that Rajpakasa was defeated in the presidential elections in January 2015 – there is national consensus on development of CPEC in Pakistan and no matter which party wins the elections CPEC will remain operational.
  • The Gwadar International Airport and Gwadar Vocational and Technical Training institute is a grant provided by China to Pakistan.
  • The establishment of Gwadar Free Zone is under a concessional-loan arrangement at below market interest rates that will generate significant economic activity, hereby increasing growth.

Why Hambantota was given to China

  • Rajpakasa was defeated in the presidential elections in 2015, which according to international observers was orchestrated by former Sri-lankan president Sirisina with US support to bring a pro-US regime
  • The pro-US regime in the country under Sirisina suspended all projects undertaken by Rajapakasa, including building a harbor, an international airport in Hambantota and the Colombo Port City.

Source: PCI

About Fariha Khan

Check Also

Pakistan Will Export 300,000 MT of Sugar to China To Earn 110 Million Dollars

Another big news for Pakistan, Pakistan and China going to sign a Free Trade Agreement …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *